Opengl 4.1 vs directx 11 software#
Opengl 4.1 vs directx 11 series#
Opengl 4.1 vs directx 11 windows#

The original Vulkan website was designed for the launch of a cutting edge new API that would, initially, have limited official materials and community content. DonвЂ™t worry, Vulkan is still maintained and owned by The Khronos Group we just felt that it had outgrown its old website now that it has been five years since the Vulkan 1.0 launch.

It has been a while in the making but we are very excited to launch the new Vulkan website to the community.

In fact, rather than stepping up security, WebCL will provide untrusted websites with even more access to your computerвЂ™s underlying hardware.The Vulkan website has a new home and look! Eerily omitted from KhronosвЂ™ announcements is any mention of the WebGL standard and continuing steps to shore up its flawed specification. KhronosвЂ™ breakneck speed has its drawbacks, though. StreamInput could certainly prove to be a killer addition to any PC, console, and smartphone, too.

Opengl 4.1 vs directx 11 windows#

Its tardiness and proprietary nature has taken its toll, too: With DirectX now only being used by Windows and Xbox gamers, and OpenGL or OpenGL ES being used across every smartphone, tablet, Wii, and PlayStation 3, it would seem that DirectX has all but lost. With OpenGL 4.2, the Khronos Group has yet again steamed ahead of Microsoft and its slow-and-steady DirectX framework. Khronos always moves quickly to provide exactly what developers want, and it usually occupies the bleeding edge with regard to the hardware capabilities of new GPUs, too.

Opengl 4.1 vs directx 11 software#

The intent of StreamInput seems to be focused on making discovery of sensors easier for software developers, and on synchronizing the input from multiple sensors, as required by augmented reality applications. StreamInput, on the other hand, is an entirely new вЂњadvanced sensor processing and user interaction APIвЂќ that is designed to provide a general, cross-platform framework for interaction between computers and the new breed of complex sensors, like tablet and smartphone touchscreens and KinectвЂ™s depth-sensing camera. Ultimately, if WebCL comes to fruition (and the demos suggest that it will), then web browsers will have access to the same amount of processing power as installed, compiled applications. The idea is that WebGL, like OpenGL, will continue to power the actual rendering of browser-based apps and games, and WebCL, like OpenCL, will allow for incredibly complex image and physics processing. On the WebCL front, Khronos has detailed how its working on a JavaScript binding to the OpenCL (GPGPU) standard, to bring heterogeneous, parallel computing to web apps.

Opengl 4.1 vs directx 11 series#

This includes the Nvidia GeForce 400 and 500 series, and ATI/AMD Radeon 50 series of graphics cards. As with previous point releases, any graphics card capable of running OpenGL 4 and 4.1 will be able to run applications that use 4.2. OpenGL 4.2, whichВ comes almost exactly a year after version 4.1, brings improved shader performance, better texture handling, and an extension that speeds up the replication and repositioning of complex objects. Terms of use.Д¬oinciding with SIGGRAPH 2011, the Khronos Group has released OpenGL 4.2, outlined exciting changes for WebCL, and detailed a new sensor processing API called StreamInput. This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page.